Posts Tagged ‘soft tissue fillers’

Problems Arise From “Bargain” Injectables

Monday, July 26th, 2010

It is not uncommon for physicians to encounter patients, who suffer the ill effects of having injection treatments for “enhancement” purposes, using substances that may have been represented to the patient as medical grade or drug regulatory approved “silicone”, “collagen” or “botox”. These patients receive injections for “breast augmentation”, “nose-lift”, “buttocks-lift”, or “anti-wrinkle” treatments and unwittingly, expose themselves to clinical complications.

The lure of advertisements and the fact that the injection treatments are presented as “cheaper” alternatives, in combination with a person’s poor body image or a desire to physically enhance one’s self, are enough to attract clients for these procedures and potentially create undesirable results.

As an example, a good number of patients who’ve had breast injections using “bargain” injectables will present with one of two problems, or a combination of both. Infection is one presenting problem. There have been instances when these injected substances cause infections in the breast, requiring surgical drainage and debridement. The consequence of such a problem is oftentimes seen in the unfortunate patient’s eyes — a sadness which is an indelible reflection of how their self-esteem has been diminished by both physical and emotional scarring, when an attempt at enhancement turns into disfigurement.

The other problem encountered in these same patients — is breast lumpiness, or the sensation of having multiple breast masses (occurring at the multiple puncture injection sites). These masses are usually felt by the patient herself and are clinically evident to the physician as well, upon a physical examination of the breast. The haunting question that this problem creates in the minds of these patients is, “Is this mass a cancer?”

It is possible that in the presence of a lumpy breast due to these injections, a cancer growth can arise from the breast glandular tissue making it indistinguishable from the other lumps by physical examination alone.  In this situation, unless a biopsy is done on each and every lump, the tool that will be useful to screen for cancer, is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) — an expensive diagnostic procedure. Thus, a patient who at the start was looking for a “bargain”, is later on saddled with an expensive proposition to do annual MRI screening for cancer surveillance. Otherwise, the specter of undetected cancer threateningly hangs over their heads.

Problems similar to those just cited occur not only in Manila but also in the United States. A recent press release by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) states that, “…four seriously ill people were hospitalized following injections of an unidentified substance at a Fort Lauderdale clinic and could be the latest victims of what has become an increasingly common problem — illegal and unsafe drugs administered as cosmetic treatments by practitioners without appropriate training and credentials.”

Former American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS) President Dr. Peter Fodor, when asked to comment on the Fort Lauderdale case, said, “The popularity of injectable treatments including BOTOX and a host of soft tissue fillers, has encouraged their promotion by inadequately trained or non-medical practitioners, some of whom may obtain illegal substances and perform procedures under non-sterile conditions.” He says furthermore,  “Unfortunately, patients sometimes are lured by promises of less expensive treatments, or they simply fail to check the qualifications of the person administering the treatments, unnecessarily risking their health and safety.”

Patients these days have to be informed patients. They should do their homework when planning to undergo certain procedures. If they eventually decide to have a procedure done, they should be sure that they’re done in appropriate facilities by a properly qualified physician who has received specific training in the particular procedure.

To do otherwise, would be putting your health, and maybe even your life, in jeopardy.

Less Frequent Dosing Of BOTOX Still Results In Reduced Wrinkles

Monday, July 26th, 2010

With real, noticeable results, no surgery and no recovery time, there are many reasons why BOTOX™  has been chosen by millions of women and men and their doctors.

BOTOX™ is a prescription medicine derived from Botulinum Toxin that works by blocking nerve impulses to the injected muscles, thereby reducing muscle activity that causes moderate to severe wrinkle lines in the face, especially those between the eyebrows (glabellar lines). Visible results are immediate but are best seen 3 to 4 days later. The effects last from 3 to 4 months and to benefit from these results continuously, a cycle of BOTOX™ injections is done at 3-4 month intervals.

A recent study done by Dr. Roger Dailey, professor and Lester Jones Endowed Chair of Oculofacial Plastic Surgery of the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) and presented at a meeting of the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons last April 24, 2010 in Washington, D.C. — has shown that patients who’ve received BOTOX™ cosmetic injections for at least 2 years can decrease the frequency of the injections to every 6 months and still receive most of the same wrinkle-smoothing cosmetic benefits.

Dr. Dailey said, “This demonstrates patients have the ability to achieve good results with broader treatment schedules and ultimately at a lower overall treatment cost.”

The research also demonstrated that BOTOX™ injections have a wrinkle preventing – or prophylactic – effect. Patients who begin receiving injections between their 30s and 50s are able to prevent wrinkles from forming aside from eliminating existing wrinkles.

BOTOX™ has been approved for cosmetic use for eight years. In 2008, more than 5 million patients in the United States received cosmetic BOTOX™ treatments, according to Allergan, the manufacturer. About 313,000 of those patients were men.

For before and after pictures of Botox patients, click HERE.

Study Shows How Soft Tissue Filler Restylane Works

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Soft tissue fillers are quite popularly used by both dermatologists and plastic surgeons as injections into the skin, to improve the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles, plump lips, fill hollow cheeks, repair various facial imperfections, improve scars, and elevate deep folds. The result is a smoother, more youthful appearance with minimal “downtime” and maximum safety.

There are a variety of soft tissue fillers, including human and bovine (cattle) collagen, hyaluronic acid, autologous fat (one’s own fat), and donor tissue. The growing number of available fillers has greatly expanded the anti-aging and skin-saving treatments, and since soft tissue filler substances do not involve major surgery and are generally cost-effective, men and women are using these youth-enhancing techniques more than ever.

One such filler that has acquired wide acceptance and usage is Restylane™ — a product containing hyaluronic acid.

It has been thought that Restylane’s physical volume caused the improvement in the appearance of one’s skin. In a study published in the journal/ Archives of Dermatology, it has been found that Restylane™ actually works by stretching fibroblasts — the cells in the skin that make collagen, in a way that causes the skin to create new collagen. This new, natural collagen would then contribute to the reduction of the appearance of creases and wrinkles. The study also shows that the product seems to inhibit the breakdown of existing collagen.

In young people, fibroblasts are stretched, and this produces enough collagen to make the skin appear relatively smooth. As people age, the fibroblasts become relaxed and do not stretch as easily, and therefore do not release as much collagen, causing creases and wrinkles to appear.

The findings of the study are based on injections in 11 volunteers, ages 64 to 84 years, and the subsequent analyses of their skin biopsies.

With the injection of Restylane™ in this study, the relaxed fibroblasts were re-stretched, says lead author Dr. Frank Wang, research fellow with the Department of Dermatology. In a sense, this stretching encourages the fibroblasts to behave in the way they do in younger skin and to release collagen.

Another factor is that in older skin, an enzyme called collagenase breaks down the collagen in the skin. The research found that injection of the dermal filler inhibits the breakdown of collagen by collagenase, which also helps with the appearance of one’s skin.

To see Before and After pictures using Restylane™, click here.